By the early fall of 1968, in the San Francisco Bay Area, and elsewhere
throughout the United States, it had become crystal clear that Black college
students, other students of color, and other progressive allies were not
willing to stand idly by and continue to be miseducated by a systemically
racist and hypocritical "educational" system. During this period in the S. F.
Bay Area, the Black Students Union (BSU) at what was then known as San
Francisco State College (now San Francisco State University), became the
vanguard in the struggle by college students. However, the Black students at
S. F. State were by no means alone.
The message in Point 5, of the Black Panther Party's Ten Point Program,
calling for (in relevant part), an "education that teaches us our true history
and our role in the present day society" was strongly resonating with Black
college students throughout the S. F. Bay Area and the nation. This message
was also taken seriously by many college students at City College of San
Francisco (CCSF), where I too was then a student and Black Panther Party
member who had recently returned from southern California, to the S. F. Bay
Area.
Of the hundreds of Black college students at CCSF, many, including Anna Barry,
Derrick Hill, Jerry L. King III, and myself were organizing on campus, in our
determination to press the CCSF administration to 1) establish an accredited
Afro American Studies Department, 2) hire Black instructors and
administrators, and 3) to create a Black history section in the college
library.
An ad hoc committee known as the Students for Action Committee (SAC), was
formed for the specific purpose of obtaining the above mentioned objectives,
and for the expressed purpose of bringing about a radical political change in
the "leadership" of Black students on CCSF's campus. As a CCSF student and SAC
organizer, I happened to also spend a considerable amount of time studying at
San Francisco State College, and building alliances between Black SAC students
from CCSF and certain members of the embattled Black Students Union (BSU) at
S. F. State. Meanwhile, Derrick Hill who was also a CCSF SAC member/organizer
was elected in campus wide elections, as student body president of City
College of San Francisco (CCSF). This was a stunning turn of events at CCSF,
which propelled the "radical" Black SAC students at CCSF into the limelight
and added momentum to our struggle to obtain a Black curriculum, Black
faculty, and a radical new Black student leadership at CCSF. The white college
administrators of CCSF were clearly angered and in shock at the victory of the
SAC contender in the campus wide student body presidential elections. Even
many of us in SAC were pleasantly surprised and encouraged that the majority
of Black, Asian, Latino/a, and white students had voted to make a radical
Black SAC member, their student body president. SAC intensified its' efforts
to bring about a fundamental change in Black student leadership of the so
called Negro Student Association (NSA), who were correctly viewed as active
collaborators with the white CCSF college administrators, and who, along with
the CCSF college administration, openly scorned the sit ins and subsequent
student strike by Black students and their allies at S. F. State. Thus, SAC
increased its' organizing activities at CCSF, calling for 1) "new" Black
student leadership at CCSF and the electoral elimination of the NSA and the
immediate creation of a CCSF Black Students Union (BSU), 2) a Black Studies
Department, hiring of Black faculty, an Afro American section in the CCSF
college library, and 3) support for the sit ins and subsequent student strike
at S F State. SAC fielded a full slate of "BSU" candidates, including myself
for chair/president, and Anna Barry for cochair/vice president for the
upcoming CCSF Black student elections.
"Burial of the Tom Negro"
To the consternation of the college administrators at CCSF, the message and
organizing activities of the Students for Action Committee (SAC) at CCSF were
well received by Black students. The CCSF Black student elections were held
and resulted overwhelmingly in the election of the entire SAC "BSU" slate
bringing in myself as chairman/president and Anna Barry as cochair/vice
president of the over four hundred member CCSF Black Students Union (BSU). As
a result of the election, all officers of the then newly named "BSU" including
myself and Anna Barry, had come from the ranks of the Black radical Students
for Action Committee (SAC) and became members of the central committee of the
CCSF BSU. Thus, SAC disbanded itself since it was now the elected CCSF BSU
leadership.
Utilizing a large makeshift wooden coffin, the first political action by the
"new officers" of the CCSF BSA/ BSU was to hold and lead, a 'Burial of the Tom
Negro' rally in CCSF's football stadium. The BSU invited others, including
CCSF students from the campus chapters of La Raza Unida, the Chinese Voice
Party (CVP), Students for A Democratic Society (SDS), and the Samoan Students
Association who all also attended the rally. At the rally, the CCSF BSU
symbolically buried what it called the 'Tom Negro' urging students to a new
political awareness based upon "unity," and called for "action" in order to
get Black faculty hired and establish an accredited "department of Afro
American Studies." The students were told to "prepare to act" with
"determination" to make the goals of the BSU a reality. [Reference: THE
GUARDSMAN newspaper of CCSF, November 27, 1968, article entitled, 'Tom Negro'
Buried During Black Students Rally Held In Stadium Last Thursday.] The CCSF
BSU followed up this rally by repeatedly leafleting the CCSF campus urging
students to support the campus objectives of the CCSF BSU, and to support and
show solidarity with the embattled students over at S. F. State College.
"Battle On The Agenda"
The CCSF BSU leaders, including myself, were collectively summoned to meet
with college administrators where we were told that we had "gone too far" in
our organizing activities on CCSF's campus, and warned that further political
activities would lead to our "expulsion." We responded that we had "not gone
far enough" and presented the administration with yet another specific list of
our "demands" re the hiring of Black faculty/administrators, establishing a
Black Studies Department, and creating an Afro American section in the college
library. We were ordered to "leave," with which we complied, and proceeded to
redouble and intensify our political organizing activities.
On Wednesday, November 20th, 1968, both myself and Anna Barry, representing
the CCSF Black Students Union (BSU) had met with CCSF's "Executive Committee
of the Academic Senate" and made it clear that the BSU not only wanted our
other requests re establishing a Black Studies Department and an Afro American
section in the college library met; but that we also had conducted our own
search for Black faculty and had found an eminently qualified Black woman (Dr.
Mary Golding), whom we insisted be hired by CCSF as a college Dean. We further
made it clear to that body that the BSU expected serious action to be taken on
these matters before the upcoming Christmas vacation. We were then told by the
Academic Senate that it was unwilling to make any commitments and scornfully
told to "wait and see." This the BSU ultimately was not willing to do.
[Reference: FREE CRITIC newspaper of CCSF, December 2nd, 1968, page 2,
entitled, EDITORIAL.]
It was clear to the CCSF BSU that the white racist administration, consisting
of white men and women, were stone walling and cared nothing about the
important academic and cultural needs of Black students at CCSF. The CCSF BSU
leadership turned to its' full membership requesting a vote on the matter. The
full BSU membership voted and authorized the BSU central committee to take a
strike vote. The central committee voted unanimously to call a strike,
authorizing myself and Anna Barry to openly call for a strike, which we did.
The intransigence of the CCSF administration had in fact "placed the battle on
the agenda."
The central committee of the CCSF BSU now had a strike mandate from the full
BSU membership and immediately engaged in intense, virtual nonstop,
negotiations with its' La Raza Unida, Chinese Voice Party (CVP), Students for
A Democratic Society (SDS), and Samoan allies on and off campus. A date was
decided upon for the CCSF student strike to occur.
Working in concert with our various allies, including Al Wong of the Chinese
Voice Party (CVP), the CCSF BSU agreed that the purpose of the strike would be
not only an "action" to demonstrate that we were serious about the issues on
CCSF's campus, but also to show solidarity with the embattled students at S F
State by attempting to draw some of the repressive police forces away from S F
State College.
On the morning of the CCSF student strike, the allies of the BSU were out in
numbers and could be identified by the arm bands which they wore throughout
the campus. The BSU for its part, sent groups of people (led by BSU members)
to every part of the campus interrupting and closing down classes, the college
library, the cafeteria, and the administration building. Simultaneously,
picket lines were put up at entrances to CCSF, including the Phelan Avenue
college entrance. The BSU held a brief rally calling on students to support
the strike and reemphasizing its importance. Within approximately thirty
minutes from the beginning of the strike action, thousands of CCSF students
had streamed out of classes, laboratories, the library, the cafeteria, etc.,
many giving the clenched fist salute in support of the strike, and hurriedly
leaving the campus. The so called "impossible" had been accomplished: City
College of San Francisco (CCSF) had been shut down. The CCSF administration
reacted precisely as the BSU and its' allies had anticipated: by calling for a
show of force by the San Francisco police department. A contingent of the
infamous San Francisco police tactical squad were rushed from the campus of S.
F. State to the campus of CCSF to put down the student strike. Yet ironically,
while the "tac squad," clad in their Gestapo-like attire was rampaging on
CCSF's campus, most of the students there, taking a lesson from Vo Nguyen
Giap's book, War of the Flea, had simply disappeared. Meanwhile, on the same
day after we students had closed down CCSF, I led a group of CCSF BSU students
to the campus of S. F. State and briefly addressed a large student rally
there, declaring our "solidarity" and informing them that CCSF "was on
strike"! The thunderous applause and shouts of approval from that crowd at S.
F. State reaffirmed the correctness of our actions.
Consequences & Benefits: The Struggle Continues
Though, relative to the student strike at S. F. State, the CCSF student strike
was short lived; the consequences and benefits were high. On the day of the
strike at CCSF, the administration immediately expelled and barred a number of
BSU leaders from campus, including myself. However, an Afro American section
was immediately established in the CCSF college library, and within a year
Black faculty and Black curriculum were brought to that college. Despite the
high personal and academic costs for certain CCSF BSU leaders, the students
ultimately won. Only the relentless political organizing activities by Black
students at CCSF had unequivocally compelled the college administration to
comply with the legitimate needs and desires of CCSF students.
BSU leaders from a number of San Francisco Bay Area colleges, including San
Francisco State College and City College of San Francisco, also held open
forums in off campus communities, with an emphasis upon reaching Black high
school students. One such forum sponsored by the organization Plan of Action
for Challenging Times (PACT), was held at Polytechnic High School in San
Francisco. At this forum a number of "BSU presidents" including "Benny
Stewart" of S. F. State, and myself of CCSF, explained the necessity for the
struggles at both colleges the need for a "revolutionary black philosophy,"
and the role of Black high school students. [Reference: San Francisco Examiner
newspaper, December 20, 1968, page 8, article entitled, 'Seizure of Power
Goal,' Poly Blacks Told and San Francisco Chronicle newspaper, December 20,
1968, page 2, article entitled, Fiery Black Meeting at Poly High.]
The impact of the Black Panther Party and particularly of Point 5, of the BPP
Ten Point Program, upon the consciousness of Black college students was
undeniably a major factor in the student movement of those times.
Today, in the 21st century, many of those hard won gains by Black students
have been eroded, while others, though under systematic intense racist
assault, remain tenaciously intact. It is absolutely necessary today, that
young and old alike learn from the lessons of the not very distant past Black
student movements, with a view towards creatively raising the consciousness of
Black youth. What is now at stake is the very survival; economically,
politically, and culturally of Black youth in particular, and Black people in
general in the United States of America. In the beginning years of the 21st
century, Black senior citizens, Black youth, and the dwindling number of Black
students etc.are not only being deliberately "left behind" with their backs
against the wall; but are callously being buried in the wall by a cynically
racist, hypocritical, and avaricious "American" society. Thus, the struggle
for economic, political, and social justice on the part of all Black people,
including Black students, assuredly must and does continue!
All Power To The People,
-- Larry Pinkney
cc: Kathleen Cleaver
Landon Williams