phillyimc.org/en/2007/10/42981.shtml
			IN PRISON MY WHOLE LIFE : An interview with William Francome
			--British documentary about US death-row journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal
			presents shocking new evidence
			By Hans Bennett
			The trailer for the new British documentary about US death-row journalist
			Mumia Abu-Jamal, titled "In Prison My Whole Life," begins with the film's
			central character, William Francome, explaining that he's "been aware of
			Mumia for as long as I can remember. That's because he was arrested on
			the night I was born, for the murder of a Philadelphia police officer. As
			my mom would often remind me, every birthday I had, has been another year
			that Mumia has spent in prison.... I am going on a journey to find out
			about the man who has been in prison my whole life."
			The 90-minute film premieres on October 25 at both The Times BFI 51st
			London Film Festival and Rome's International Film Festival. With the
			acclaimed British actor Colin Firth as an executive producer, "In Prison
			My Whole Life" is directed by Marc Evans and produced by Livia Firth and
			Nick Goodwin Self. The film has interviews with such figures as Alice
			Walker, Angela Davis, Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Ramona Africa, and
			musicians Mos Def, Snoop Dogg and Steve Earle. Amnesty International, who
			concluded in a previous report that Abu-Jamal's original 1982 trial was
			unfair, is supporting "In Prison" as part as part of its international
			campaign to abolish the death penalty. Amnesty International UK Director
			Kate Allen says: "It's shocking that the US justice system has repeatedly
			failed to address the appalling violation of Mumia Abu-Jamal's
			fundamental fair trial rights."
			In this exclusive interview on the eve of the film's premiere, Francome
			discloses for the very first time, one of the movies biggest surprises:
			The film will prominently feature the startling Dec. 9, 1981 crime scene
			photos that were recently discovered by German author Michael Schiffmann,
			and are published in his new book. Never presented to the 1982 jury,
			these new photos (taken by press-photographer Pedro Polakoff) "bolster
			claims of Mumia's innocence and unfair trial," according to Black
			Commentator columnist David A. Love.
			Polakoff's photos have been shown on the Journalists for Mumia website
			since Dr. Schiffmann unveiled the photos in May, the same week that The
			US Third Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments regarding the
			fairness of Abu-Jamal's 1982 trial (listen to courtroom audio). While
			waiting for this important court ruling (expected any week), Abu-Jamal's
			international support network has initiated a media-activist campaign
			demanding that the major media outlets acknowledge the new crime scene
			photos. One of Polakoff's photos will be published for the first time in
			the US, in this week's issue of The San Francisco Bay View National Black
			Newspaper, which has previously reported on Abu-Jamal's case.
			Francome cannot reveal any more of the film's big surprises, but he does
			say that "the film interviews people who have never told their story of
			the events of that night for the first time ever and offers new insight
			and theories as to what happened on Locust Street in 1981. To learn more
			about this, people ought to go and watch the film."
			Hans Bennett: What can you tell us about the new crime scene photos
			discovered by German author Michael Schiffmann, and how they appear in
			your film?
			William Francome: The photos of press photographer Pedro Polakoff feature
			in the film as well as an interview with him and Michael Schiffmann, the
			German author who found them.
			We had been in contact with Michael from the beginning of this project as
			he is one of the most knowledgeable people on the case. He had been
			working on his book 'Race Against Death' when he found a photo online
			that he realized was not taken by the police at the scene. Somehow
			(Michael is an amazing investigator) he found Pedro who was a press
			photographer at the time of the shootings in December of 1981. Pedro had
			arrived on the scene within minutes and captured much of the initial
			chaos of the scene.
			They are quite amazing photographs as they show the complete lack of
			professionalism by the police who were faced with the task of preserving
			the crime scene and any forensic evidence that might be inherent within
			it. There are pictures of a police officer holding both of the weapons at
			the scene in one hand without gloves, which would therefore completely
			contaminate any fingerprints or gun powder residue. They also show the
			police walking in and out of the scene and show that Officer Faulkner's
			hat was moved from photo to photo. I may just be a layman in terms of
			crime scene maintenance but it seems to me that these are grave and
			almost criminally negligent mistakes to make. There is also the issue of
			bullet holes or the lack thereof in the pavement. The photos should show
			where bullet fragments would have been found in the surrounding cement
			according to the prosecution witnesses' account, but this is not the
			case.
			Whether or not these acts were made on purpose remains to be seen, but
			the photos could have helped clear this case up from the very beginning.
			Now we are 25 years down the line and we are still asking basic questions
			of the initial evidence that should not have been left for so long
			unanswered. Meanwhile, a man is on death row who claims he's innocent and
			it's been a quarter of a century since a policeman was killed and many
			feel the killing hasn't been sufficiently solved.
			What makes the issue of the photos even more important is that they were
			purposefully ignored by the prosecution and the District Attorney's
			Office. Pedro says that he rang them and told them of his photographs and
			offered them for use in the trial, but that the office never got back to
			him. It is obvious that the prosecution knew that the photographs of the
			crime scene could have done their case some damage in court and therefore
			outright ignored them.
			HB: Where does the movie go from here? When can people in the US view it?
			WF: The film is about to premiere at the London and Rome film festivals
			and I'm very happy to say that it's sold out all of its screenings. We
			are still at the early stages and we have to wait and see if and when it
			gets taken on by a distributor, what happens next. I'm sure at some point
			in the near future we'll be screening the film in the US. The film was
			shot in America and mostly deals with American issues so I look forward
			to seeing the reaction it gets there. I myself am half American, and
			spent my teenage years in New York, so I have enjoyed making a film about
			the country I grew up in as well as having been able to look at it as an
			outsider.
			HB: Why is Mumia's case still so important after 25 years?
			WF: I think the fact that Mumia's case is still being debated after
			twenty five years is an issue in itself. It seems unbelievable to me that
			you could keep someone in solitary confinement for a quarter of a century
			as well as having a death sentence hanging over him that whole time. The
			starting point of this film is that it's been my whole life, and
			considering all the things that I have done and all the memories I have
			really helps to put the whole thing in perspective. Try thinking back to
			what you were doing in 1981 and it might have the same effect. In that
			time, there have been hundreds of people executed and there are still
			over 3,000 currently sitting on death row in America. However, despite
			evidence that people innocent of the crimes they were convicted for have
			been executed and over 100 people who have been exonerated and released
			from death row because of new evidence, the death penalty system in
			America still grinds forward.
			After 25 years, the questions of race, cost and inadequate legal
			representation have yet to be fully and honestly addressed and the issues
			that caused it to be declared unconstitutional in the 70's persist. In
			short, as long as there is a death penalty in the United States, Mumia's
			case and the case of all death row inmates will remain vital and
			important. People should see this movie because they too seek for answers
			and honesty from the criminal justice system, and they too, want to gain
			a greater understanding of the inherent flaws in the death penalty system
			in the U.S.
			Even if people can't relate to the story of Mumia Abu-Jamal or are not
			affected by it, they might still be able to relate to my story. I think
			for many people, the journey that I'm going on is enough on its own. This
			is the story of two lives coming together in a sense, and hopefully it
			will allow many who have previously been uninterested in the issues
			surrounding the case to sit up, take notice and find out more on their
			own. In a ninety minute film, it is hard to comprehensively look into any
			subject, but you hope that it gives the audience enough to go away and
			delve further.
			--Hans Bennett is an independent journalist and co-founder (with German
			author Michael Schiffmann) of Journalists for Mumia Abu-Jamal
			(Abu-Jamal-News.com).
			
			author of "The Black Holocaust for Beginners"
			Social Activism is not a hobby: it's a Lifestyle lasting a Lifetime
			blackeducator.blogspot.com
			
			 
			--
			Want an e-mail address like mine?
			Get a free e-mail account today at www.mail.com!